Posted by:
Nightingale
(
)
Date: June 24, 2013 05:58PM
Is it no more door to door at all for any missionaries?
If so, can you imagine the celebrations occurring in mishie apartments all over creation right now? Even cleaning toilets (if that is what it comes down to in the end - no pun intended, lol) has got to be better than marching through neighbourhoods in hot weather, cold weather, monsoons and snowstorms, only to encounter impatient, fed up people who have heard it all before - and don't want any of it.
The mishies won't think at first of all the down sides for them. The more constant scrutiny by ward members, bishops and WMLs. No opportunity to meet regular non-LDS folk in the course of a day out and about in the community. And potentially constant monitoring of all their online activity, even to the point of how much interest in the church they individually have been able to garner.
But the boredom factor will likely weigh in even more than it's already present, if that is possible. Boring meetings, boring correlation, boring P-days (too controlled and time-constricted), boring companions, boring interviews, boring discussions. And now, sitting around in a chapel all day - is that really what the new program is? How inactive (no pun intended, lol). How unhealthy. Hour after hour after hour of - absolutely nothing.
I guess members and guests (if any?) can look forward to cleaner premises? Maybe? If an army of mishies has all the time in the world to take up their mops and buckets and march forth to usher in God's Kingdom.
For the church, a big down side of the new push is that it takes a lot more of a commitment from a friend or neighbour of a TBM to agree to go to the church to meet the missionaries than a simple dinner invite where the missionaries "just happen" to be included or show up, or other ruse that either party tries. (For me, my one TBM friend in the world asked me over for dinner. I had no clue that she had also asked missionaries to join us and that they actually considered our dinnertime talk to be our "first discussion"). (Sheesh!)
It could also be a big pain for all of us if it means more Mormon "trolls" or well-intentioned TBMs straying where they don't belong (like our FB or sites like this if they proceed to defend the Mormon Church - otherwise they ARE welcome).
What I don't understand - really Do Not Understand - is how the Mormon Church is not only always behind the game but always so very Completely Clueless.
The Mormon Church and the WatchTower Society ("WTS" -JWs) share many similarities. I should know - I've been in both (yeah, slow-learner, that's me). However, the JWs would seem to have their act together far more than Mormonism ever has done (at least in the decades of which I'm aware). They have a far more cohesive message. They have a more polished/prepared presentation. They are run by a group or board type of idea rather than a single man/prophet (less room for infirmity or unexpected events to become obvious). They don't make so many missteps, at least that are obvious to the public or even ex-members. They don't want quick conversions or baptisms. Yes, they keep track of numbers but they don't push for numbers to the exclusion of common sense. They find it much more profitable (in all senses of the word) to require that prospective converts know at least the doctrines of their organization, if not the actual history. They don't want you if you don't want them was the message I got. They wouldn't even let me get baptized until I was 18, despite my fervent wishes to jump into their tank at 17. They pulled back from door knocking and even street corner magazine stands years ago and they have been instructed now to withdraw as soon as someone expresses disagreement. Their take on it, as I understand it, is that they don't need to persuade, only to find anyone who is already waiting to hear their message.
In short, why is the WTS, an organization with many similarities to the Mormon Church, so much more clued-in about how to "preach [their] word"? True enough, both organizations claim to have the only living prophet in this age. But the WTS prophet is the organization itself whereas the Mormon prophet is T. Monson (whose middle initial I don't even know). Why is the WTS "prophet" so much better streamlined and slick than the Mormon prophet?
Maybe Mormon Church officials or reps have taken to heart some of the many suggestions that ex-members have made on this board for how to make the church programs and the missionary experience better - for members and non-members alike - but as usual, they have got the implementation wrong.
Or maybe they are silently concurring that the missionary program as it has been run to date is just not working any more, if it ever did.
On dark, dreary, rainy days here on the Wet Coast of Canada (Pacific) maybe the mishies are happy being indoors, even if they've only got the plants to talk to. Wait - do they even have plants in those chapels? But compared to other alternatives, like real service work, as described in other threads on this topic, what a colossal waste of two years x 70,000 young adults? Yowch.
(Edited to change subject line from yesterday and to tweak a few thoughts internally).
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/25/2013 02:13PM by Nightingale.