Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: Pixie Dust ( )
Date: September 04, 2012 05:54PM

I was listing to a sermon on the radio as I was driving to town this morning. The pastor was speaking about the truths found within the Bible. Then he said that the Smithsonian Institution was given the task of finding evidence to support the Book of Mormon.

The Smithsonian could not find any evidence to prove the Book of Mormon was factual. Here is a prominent institution that can't find any evidence.

I became quiet and sad. I was hoping for some shred of evidence to prove something within the Book of Mormon was true. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

Something in side of me was hoping something from this God-forsaken church was factual. Sigh!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Zeezromp ( )
Date: September 04, 2012 06:31PM

The Book of Mormon makes a total 'ass' of itself when it comes to history/archeology of when/where it is supposed to have happened.

It doesn't get anything right in terms of New World plants, animals, weapons etc.

It's so obvious. I don't know how Mormons still hold on to it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: xyz ( )
Date: September 04, 2012 06:39PM

The Smithsonian Institution was never given the task of finding evidence to support the Book of Mormon.

The Smithsonian was, however, sick to death of fielding idiotic queries from Mormons hoping they would use the Book of Mormon as a field guide in their archeological studies. In response to those idiotic queries, the Smithsonian Institute issued a form letter response and sends it whenever there is another idiotic query from a TBM...:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology_and_the_Book_of_Mormon#Smithsonian_Institution

Here is a scanned copy of the form letter:
http://www.irr.org/mit/smithsonian.html

p.s.: the BoM is a lot of things, but it is spectacularly not archeologically factual in any way, shape, or form.

Cheers!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: WyoCowboy ( )
Date: September 04, 2015 05:12PM

Here is the original Letter and statement sent out.

Smithsonian Institution Statement Regarding the Book of Mormon
Information from the National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Statement Regarding the Book of Mormon
1. The Smithsonian Institution has never used the Book of Mormon in any way as a scientific guide. Smithsonian archaeologists see no direct connection between the archaeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book.
2. The physical type of the American Indian is basically Mongoloid, being most closely related to that of the peoples of eastern, central, and northeastern Asia. Archaeological evidence indicates that the ancestors of the present Indians came into the New World -- probably over a land bridge known to have existed in the Bering Strait region during the last Ice Age -- in a continuing series of small migrations beginning from about 25,000 to 30,000 years ago.
3. Present evidence indicates that the first people to reach this continent from the East were the Norsemen who briefly visited the northeastern part of North America around A.D. 1000 and then settled in Greenland. There is nothing to show that they reached Mexico or Central America.
4. One of the main lines of evidence supporting the scientific finding that contacts with Old World civilizations, if indeed they occurred at all, were of very little significance for the development of American Indian civilizations, is the fact that none of the principal Old World domesticated food plants or animals (except the dog) occurred in the New World in pre-Columbian times. American Indians had no wheat, barley, oats, millet, rice, cattle, pigs, chickens, horses, donkeys, camels before 1492. (Camels and horses were in the Americas, along with the bison, mammoth, and mastodon, but all these animals became extinct around 10,000 B.C. at the time the early big game (sic) hunters spread across the Americas.)
5. Iron, steel, glass, and silk were not used in the New World before 1492 (except for occasional use of unsmelted meteoric iron). Native copper was worked used (sic) in various locations in pre-Columbian times, but true metallurgy was limited to southern Mexico and the Andean region, where its occurrence in late prehistoric times involved gold, silver, copper, and their alloys, but not iron.
6. There is a possibility that the spread of cultural traits across the Pacific to Mesoamerica and the northwestern coast of South America began several hundred years before the Christian era. However, any such inter-hemispheric contacts appear to have been the results of accidental voyages originating in eastern and southern Asia. It is by means certain that even such contacts occurred; certainly there were no contacts with the ancient Egyptians, Hebrews, or other peoples of Western Asia and the Near East.
7. No reputable Egyptologist or other specialist on Old World archaeology, and no expert on New World prehistory, has discovered or confirmed any relationship between archaeological remains in Mexico and archaeological remains in Egypt.
8. Reports of findings of ancient Egyptian, Hebrew, and other Old World writings in the New World in pre-Columbian contexts have frequently appeared in newspapers, magazines, and sensational books. None of these claims has stood up to examination by reputable scholars. No inscriptions using Old World forms of writing have been shown to have occurred in any part of the Americas before 1492 except for a few Norse rune stones which have been found in Greenland.
9. There are copies of the Book of Mormon in the library of the National Museum, of NaturalHistory, Smithsonian Institution.

The Smithsonian has not retracted any of its previous statements.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: elderolddog ( )
Date: September 05, 2015 12:51AM

WyoCowboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here is the original Letter and statement sent
> out.
>
> Smithsonian Institution Statement Regarding the
> Book of Mormon
> Information from the National Museum of Natural
> History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
> 20560
> Statement Regarding the Book of Mormon:

<snip>


> The Smithsonian has not retracted
> any of its previous statements.

You can accept facts or you can have a testimony of the gospel, just not at the same time.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   *******   ********  ********  **        
 **     **  **     **  **        **        **    **  
 **     **  **     **  **        **        **    **  
 *********   ********  ******    ******    **    **  
 **     **         **  **        **        ********* 
 **     **  **     **  **        **              **  
 **     **   *******   ********  ********        **