Posted by:
steve benson
(
)
Date: January 28, 2012 03:04AM
by "Huffington Post" poster "LiberalMormon":
"Your use of the phrase 'necro-dunking dead non-mormons' is (probably intentionally) misleading and sensational. As I am pretty sure you know, LDS baptisms for the dead are done by living people as proxies for individuals who have died. 'Necro-baptizing' might conjure up a good cartoon, but it is not reflective of what actually happens in LDS temples."
_____
My response:
What is "sensational" (not to mention grossly insensitive) is the Mormon church's secret practice in bizarre temple rituals that turns Holocaust-slaughtered Jews into Mormons by bringing them to the LDS Jesus through proxy dead-dunking [not to mention doing it without the knowledge or consent of the family of the victims).
As to your complaint of mispresentation of what LDS necro-dunking really is, one ex-Mormon has astutely observed:
"[quoting CA girl from RfM]: We don't actually baptize dead bodies, you understand. We baptize live human beings who are pretending to be the spirits that have left these dead bodies and ascended from the physical realm. Please try to understand this point because it's really important to us that you see how normal Mormons are."
(For the thread in which the above answer appears--pending moderator approval of it--see:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/25/mormon-church-mitt-romney_n_1229322.html)
_____
As to defending the term "necro-dunking" itself, it's an easy proposition and here's why:
I've seen the Mormon "baptism for the dead" ritual procedure first-hand, having at one time been a temple worker in the Provo temple assigned to the dunk tank, where I was tasked with making sure each person being dunked went completely under the water.
If asked by the media to describe what goes on behind Mormon temple walls when it comes to so-called "baptisms for the dead," I would not hesitate to employ the "dunk" term--and here's why (which I would explain to the interviewer):
--The dunking involves dully and rotely reading from a scrolling list of names on a proxy poolside screen.
--Young stand-ins (often provided from the ranks Mormon teenage youth groups) are herded into the ox tub.
--Several dead people are vicariously dunked in rapid, monotonous succession via each warm-bodied vicarious volunteer--the latter who is repeatedly and mechanically put under by the priesthood baptizer reading off the screen.
--The soaked stand-in is then herded out of the tank, given a towel as they drippingly emerge and pointed toward the changing room.
--Then comes the next compliant stand-in.
--Over and over and over. The process has all the charm and spirituality of taking a number at a barbershop. It is a virtual cattle call, conveyor belt, numb-minded operation that literally put me to sleep just watching it from my vantage point alongside the tub.
"Dunk" is, therefore, a very appropriate term.
Attempts by some to liken the term "dunking" to the "F-word" is a silly exercise in non-comparability--a water-logged effort to protect feelings at the expense of facts that doesn't hold H2O and which sinks like a rock.
So, I say dump the facade and cut to the facts.
Indeed, when talking to the media about "vicarious" Mormon baptisms for the dead, the term "dunk" fits right in as an apt descriptor not only for the reasons I cited but because of the fact that working in the media, I know how reporters appreciate access to telling, accurate details--particularly when practitioners of the secret arts want to keep the details to a minimum.
Now, if offended Mormons have a problem with the "dunk" term being applied to their temple baptism dopey hokey-pokey, tough. Cry me a filled font. They are not in the least bit concerned with how offensive this cult practice is to the memory of the devout dead who died for and/or in their religion of choice, not to mention how insensitive the ritual is in trampling on the feelings of the dead's family.
If non-Mormons are troubled by such explicit descriptions of what really goes on in the Mormon temple dunk tank, then they need to remember, as Benjamin Franklin observed, that the sting of the reproach is the truth of it.
Mormonism's post-mortem watering of the dead is a dull, dumb, desensitized dunking exercise--and that's what, if asked, I would publicly call it.
--As to using the the term "necro," well, as the Mormon Church would say, "Death--Isn't It About Time?"
I say give the masses and the media the facts and let the inconvenient cult chips fall where they may. Telling the truth about this "sacred" Mormon practice is, in my opinion, a definite slam dunk.
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 01/28/2012 12:30PM by steve benson.