Posted by:
amos
(
)
Date: October 23, 2010 12:08PM
The first time I specifically remember feeling the scary sense of vertigo, the first time the explicit thought that the church might not be true occured, was reading about Mountain Meadows in 2007.
Five years earlier I ran across an apologetic version, which did a good job of blaming it on local hysteria. But, it had left out the nauseating details. The more explicit versions I was reading almost made me vomit, and my head ached and reeled for hours.
But it wasn't the massacre itself that made me suspicious of the church. The massacre simply wasn't in the intererst of the church in the first place, and though I think Young was grossly negligent for waging a stand-off with the US, I'm convinced that he would have seen the seige as a liability and that he really did try to call it off.
What made me suspicious of the church was it's disingenuous preemptive publicity, releasing an apologetic version of events to head off the movie September Dawn. It was all about protecting the church and Brigham Young, and focusing blame on local scapegoats even more, and even making the church out as a victim. They stooped the LOWEST by getting the one or two LDS descendants of massacre victims they could find to make statements in favor of the church!
But I might have gotten over that, with the victims a century and a half removed.
The crack that turned into a fissure for me was the FLDS news, i.e., bottom line: stagutory rape/child-polygamy.
Same disingenuous spin from the church, distancing, denying, shifting blame, but most of all a TOTAL DISREGARD for contemporary child-victims. This, much more than MMM, made the brethren sweat and squirm. Polygamy's still on the books and they know it. Hinckley's "I don't think it's doctrinal" was a HUGE WTF? to me. Huh???
What I didn't understand was why the church didn't try to defend the difference between false polygamy and true polygamy. See, I didn't yet know what they knew, that the church's history was even more damning than FLDS news on TV. I didn't know about Fanny Alger and Helen Mar Kimball et al. I still thought evil "antis" were lying and making it look bad, and if the church would just speak up and own it, they could at least win back some FLDS if not pacify the mob.
But from then on I didn't trust Joseph Smith, BEFORE I'd ever heard of his victims. The fissure never closed.
Meanwhile a guilt/jealousy complex based largely on my dogmatic worldview almost drove me to suicide ('nother story). My testimony finally collapsed at a specific date and time. I finally thought the church CAN"T be true after propping it up and stretching credulity to the limit and adopting all kinds of deformed reasoning. Like an ill-designed and built structure, it just collapsed under it's own weight.
THEN I researched it, and found all the facts and research out there that, for the average consumer, blow the deal in a few minutes.