Posted by:
Cheryl
(
)
Date: May 10, 2011 07:08AM
When someone says they still suffer from mormon programming, is it fair to tell them that they're wrong? It must be something else causing their pain?
If a close family member is suffering from what appears to be caused by mormonism, is it logical to say the poster is wrong? Some other poster knows what's causing the problem better than the person who is married to them or lives with them daily???
When a poster is exploring how to recover, is it fair for other posters to tell them they don't know what they're talking about because their problem happens in other religions? The fact that other fundamentalist religions have similar problems seems a poor excuse for discounting what posters are feeling while they're recovering from mormonism.
Is it fair to discount all unfavorable obserations of mormonism as caused by "hatred" when a poster hasn't even expressed hatred? Such a blanket generalization isn't logical.
It makes no sense that total strangers on the internet know the motivations of other posters better than they know themselves. Posters are the only windows we have to the motivations of those who are close to them. Saying they are wrong and hatefilled is unprovable. Discounting whatever they say simply because it's uncomplimentary of mormonism is illogical.
If someone has no problem with believing mormons in their lives, then so be it.
If someone else sees prolbems with mormons they deal with, that's their real experience. Others who have never met them and know nothing of their situation haven't a right to claim to know more about them than they do.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/10/2011 08:27AM by Cheryl.