Posted by:
spanner
(
)
Date: January 28, 2015 11:09PM
It was a couple of the New Testament references that may refer to adult/child relationships.
Leviticus laid out purity requirements for priests. There is an article here that lays out the possible reasoning behind the abominations:
http://kodu.ut.ee/~cect/teoreetilised%20seminarid_2011/teoreetiline%20seminar%2015.03.2011/Douglas.pdfBasically, abstaining from blokes was a requirement for priests while they were on duty (they rotated apparently). And the purpose probably had more to do with avoiding practices that were part of the cult rituals of other peoples (male priests of some of the female fertility goddesses would take on the persona of the goddess and bonk worshippers). That practice clearly has absolutely nothing to do with modern gay life. The cult priests the worshippers were bonking were not specifically gay anyway. It would be quite a stretch to extrapolate ethics from leviticus at all.
Anyway, Fundies who claim there is some sort of difference between the sleeping with men law and the laws against mixing materials and eating certain foods are hugely mistaken.