Posted by:
Nightingale
(
)
Date: May 08, 2017 11:54AM
azsteve: "I have guessed (possibly in error) that maybe the Admins allow the insults and attacks to continue as a part of the therapy on the board."
I am glad to see you acknowledge that your impression about this is erroneous. I have been here long enough to have seen these discussions before and the explanations. I am also obsessive about reading and followng rules (as much as humanly possible, I try). This board is called Recovery and yet it's been explained many times that it is not intended as actual literal 'therapy'. People in need of formal therapy are strongly encouraged to seek it out in real life. Nobody here, Admin or posters, takes responsibility for dispensing literal therapy. Admin folks are not licensed therapists and do not offer psychological services nor do they encourage it from posters; in fact, they actively discourage such messages (or adverts for it). I am not a counsellor or therapist. I would wonder, though, about anyone who offered "insults and attacks" and called it "therapy".
I think you're halfway there to revising your initial impression about there being some kind of deliberate business model that includes a policy of "allowing" attacks and insults, among other undesirable approaches here. Most of the rest of the way is to lose the idea that moderation of this ultra active board is one cohesive, consistent, methodical, continual operation (no offence intended to Eric!) They've explained frequently that it's a series of individuals who mod in general with board rules in mind, as and when they can. I imagine they also look at reports by posters, consider the reported posts and then decide whether something really needs to go or if there is a reason to allow it to stay up. Eric has explained often that he favours the side of allowing people to express themselves, as I've said. That does not purposely ignore "attacks" or "insults".
So what is left is posters learning to go with the ebb and flow of an internet discussion board that cannot possibly be all things to all people at all times. If/when the board is not meeting our personal needs, maybe it's too soon after our exit from the church, maybe we need to get used to public posting, perhaps our particular needs just can't be 100% met in this manner, sometimes we are feeling too fragile, timid or vulnerable to post what we're longing to share or maybe the group here at the time just can't deliver what we're looking for and we really need someone in our lives (therapist, family, friend) to listen to our story and help us find solutions. None of that is the fault of the board or Admin or Eric. It's just the reality of the cards we were dealt (especially BICs) and the situation we are currently in. So much of it, as has been said, depends on our own attitude and impressions and we bear the responsibility to deal with it, or not if we choose to go elsewhere. Perhaps the most satisfying solution re internet boards is to find one more suitable for us (which can change at various stages of our exit process and other life matters) or to find several, each of which can meet a certain need. There is unlikely to be one place that absolutely fits us perfectly. If we do find one, what a bonus. (And especially as so many are free. In which case I hold off on public criticism of them or their mods or founders/owners).
"If that is the case, the admins should disclose this publicly somewhere here."
As above, it is not the case. Admin has absolutely stated this publicly. (I believe it's addressed in the rules posted at the top of this discussion board).
"Either way, I don't think it's healthy to tolerate personal insults here."
Again, see the rules. They state that personal insults are NOT tolerated.
So, in line with what I've already stated, if a comment you report is not deleted, either they haven't seen it (as they have said does happen) or they have chosen to allow it to stand. If you want to know why, you're encouraged to email and ask. Or you can assume that perhaps it's because they deemed the comment to be OK. Then it's up to you to either write and ask why, as said, or read it again a while later (not in the heat of the moment) and see if you still think it's a deliberate "attack" or "personal insult" or is it perhaps your perception or feelings or political leaning or ??? which may be causing you to see something that either isn't there or could be seen in an opposite light by a less biased reader.
I don't generally post personal feelings here (such as "I'm sad, help me") or specific family information (such as "just had a big fight with xyz") as it's not usually my style but also I'm not looking for that kind of help from this board. I also don't want to post when I'm in need of emotional support and take a chance that I won't like how someone might respond.
That is not a statement against RfM. It is how I choose to use the board. If I need personal support, as opposed to having queries about Mormonism or wanting to share reflections about having joined the church, I go somewhere in real life.
That is also not a criticism of those who *do* use RfM to get personal support from other posters. If that works for them, great. I'm always glad to see that.
So. It can be a great resource. It depends what an individual is expecting from it. And what they give back, to some extent, as well.
Thinking there is some grand conspiracy amongst Admin to push some weird kind of vicious "anti-therapy" is an impression that is a long way off reality. I'm just saying so that maybe you can further refine your impression and perhaps get something more positive out of the board, azsteve. Or not. And then maybe that's your answer.