Posted by:
ferdchet
(
)
Date: October 22, 2014 09:54AM
anti-mormon? anti-faith?
Tell them - it's just truth. These are true statements. Truth isn't anti-mormon, it's just truth. These particular truths may not be friendly to mormonism, but that doesn't make them less true.
Or if you want something maybe a little more erudite, John Dehlin posted on FB and I caught this via Jeremy Runnells.
(https://www.facebook.com/johndehlin/posts/817261710049)
Now that thorough, well-researched, and super-accurate resources like
http://cesletter.com and
http://mormonthink.com exist, the LDS church appears to be in the very difficult place of feeling the need to condemn a source as "anti-Mormon" when it is (in reality) only speaking the truth about Mormonism....in a way that the church itself has failed to do for decades...if not over a century.
This seems like a very difficult and unenviable place to be.....where telling the truth about Mormonism is considered in and of itself to be an anti-Mormon act.
I hope that someday learning and telling the truth about Mormonism can be labeled as just that....learning and telling the truth about Mormonism.....and that someday, our more informed/open/honest LDS church members are no longer marginalized and/or punished for simply learning and repeating what is undeniably true.
Or a comment in the thread that followed might help you too:
If facts are considered anti-mormon what does that say about things that are pro-mormon?
(I like that one - I will steal it shamelessly)