Posted by:
AmIDarkNow?
(
)
Date: February 05, 2011 05:01PM
“none other than the prophet Abraham saw fit to ensure that his writings would end up in some normal Egyptian guy's tomb and then sold on to JS thousands of years later”
Not just one guy’s tomb, many, many tombs of the same kinds of Papyrus where only the names and such were different based on who was buried. (funny that they weren’t all of great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, ……..granpa Abe)
Oh and that faith in spite of the lack of evidence thing? In the Bible Christ personally gave evidence himself to Thomas so that he would believe. Only then did Thomas become “Thomas the Believer”. How in the name of the “bible” that this one act of Christ does not trump every so called claim of faith without evidence and that it should somehow be a virtue, is beyond me.
Why are the lesser humans not given this same opportunity instead of the demand to have faith without or even contrary to evidence? The contradiction of "Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed." Doesn’t exactly qualify what that blessing is does it? IMO the so called blessing is the curse of gullibility.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2011 05:01PM by AmIDarkNow?.