Your point being?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Exmormon.org- Honest Inquiry Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by SWN on July 08, 1998 at 12:54:11:

In Reply to: So what? posted by Trixie on July 08, 1998 at 10:55:47:

As with most, your statements are made up of conjecture with nothing of substance to invalidate the Evidance presented in these papers. Do more than simply say the Book of Mormom is not valid, show me some evidence that is not founded in guess work.

Follow Ups:

my point being Trixie 13:03:53 7/08/98 (7)
- It already exists SWN 16:56:56 7/08/98 (6)
  - Still have your apologist cap on? rpcman 17:50:33 7/08/98 (2)
    - just some brown nosin' Trixie 20:00:40 7/08/98 (1)
      - aw... shucks.... blush, blush rpcman 21:58:58 7/08/98 (0)
  - Been there, done that Carlos 17:40:22 7/08/98 (0)
  - BoM Trixie 17:37:32 7/08/98 (0)
  - Late entry into the discussion DNA 17:31:51 7/08/98 (0)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Exmormon.org- Honest Inquiry Message Board ] [ FAQ ]