Posted by Douglas... on May 18, 1999 at 17:12:17:
In Reply to: it's only a problem to those who insist on a literal interpretation of the Bible, anyway posted by Trixie on May 17, 1999 at 00:13:38:
: I never really did feel that believing in evolution would automatically disqualify the existence of a creator (although I am an agnostic, I readily admit that there is just as much chance a creator exists as not). It's only a problem for those who insist upon a literal interpretation of the story of Adam, anyway.
: I even believed in evolution as a devout mormon. I just believed there was a designated time when "god" put the "spirit" of man into the evolved creature.
: Just my thoughts off the cuff, I didn't read the site, will try to get to it later (it is way too late for me to tackle tonight - and the format of the page is rather off-putting)
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
I believe the Bible should be taken literally;
I do not need the theory of evolution. It is a
fake, don't you know? It has no real scientific
basis. What's your problem with The Bible and the
Book of Mormon?
I am an Architect. Architecture iS both an Art
and a Science; I can think both deductively and
inductively --intuitively and/or by scientific
method.
Understanding religion comes by Faith.
"Who has science and has art
Religion too has he
Who hath not science nor has art
let him religions be."
Goethe
Have faith... in LOVE (YHWH).
Believing is seeing. (Hebrews 11:1)
For Christ's sake, I am Douglas...
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777