Posted by MEYER on August 06, 1998 at 12:35:00:
In Reply to: Yet another response posted by Carlos on August 06, 1998 at 11:12:23:
There is nothing new in that article. It is more speculative science without any evidence to support where the "beginning" came from or what caused it.
Science avoids issues like "creator" and "God" and substitute with words like "cause" and "beginnings". And at the same time accuse those outside of science with their own opinions, of dwelling into the supernatural.
I am not the enemy. I am only telling you the truth as I see it. The only way for science to explain the BB is to either change our natural laws, or add multidimensions and universes in their equations. And That is pseudoscience in the nth degree. But that is fine, I have no problems with scientists exploring and postulating unknowns and the possible unknowables. But what I do have a problem with is scientists pointing fingers at a chosen few and claiming "you're not practicing science", or "it isn't science if it is not testable and falsifiable". And on several different forums I have seen this happen over again.
What I believe is irrelevant to this topic. But if you really want to know in who I put my faith I will tell you. But, to stay within the confines of the webmasters wishes, I will wait and see if anyone else posts their "faith" based opinions without being deleted. My faith is not science, annd the "beginner" I believe in is not testable or falsifiable. And neither is multiuniverse cosmology and multidimensions.