Posted by Carlos on August 06, 1998 at 11:12:23:
In Reply to: Right... posted by MEYER on August 05, 1998 at 22:48:48:
MEYER said:
Again, I am willing to call it BEGINNING, but it still implies the same thing. An event that was un-explanable and "Bang" to natural laws.
There has been considerable research into the big bang and what caused it; it may not be "unexplainable". The link below is to a US News article that I referenced in a previous post that outlines various theories and speculations on the origin of the universe.
We are all free to believe what we want. The webmaster has stated he wants facts and science and NO wishful thinking and dreams. I ask you, where is the scientific bases for the belief that the universe has a beginning, but no creation? Both ideas are equally unscientific because both are outside of science, and both implie nothing about the creator. For all you know I could believe the creator is a munchkin.
As cm said, you've only told us what you don't believe - what exactly do you believe?