Message Board Archive

Honest Intellectual Inquiry Bulletin Board Archive

Reply in the section at the bottom rather than in the section on the page of the message to which you are replying.

[Post Message] [FAQ] [Message Boards Main Page] [Site Map]

Please read this before responding to any archived messages!
Some administrative items (please read before posting)
Straw man arguments - Tom 15:55:39 9/15/99 (36)
- straw, or hay if you prefer. - the admiral 18:49:55 9/15/99 (6)
  - Creationists - Tom 16:14:58 9/16/99 (5)
    - Duane Gish - part II - Robert 17:05:31 9/16/99 (0)
    - Duane Gish - Robert 17:03:11 9/16/99 (0)
    - Henry Morris - Robert 17:00:04 9/16/99 (2)
      - Henry and Duane - Tom 08:54:38 9/17/99 (1)
        
        What I was saying is that they are weak examples of evolutionary scientists. Deep down, they are still creationists.(nt) - Robert 09:12:49 9/17/99 (0)
- claims - rpcman 16:13:41 9/15/99 (28)
  - Macroevolution - Tom 16:18:42 9/16/99 (27)
    - So you are saying that you are shortsighted? - rpcman 16:55:07 9/16/99 (26)
      - Macroevolution - Tom 08:46:16 9/17/99 (21)
        
        So you are a follower of Gould? - rpcman 11:15:38 9/17/99 (19)
        
        An Interesting Discussion - Jane 11:07:41 9/19/99 (0)
        
        Skepticism - Tom 12:43:45 9/17/99 (17)
        
        to the point - rpcman 13:46:15 9/17/99 (16)
        
        Macroevolution - Tom 16:47:01 9/17/99 (15)
        
        How intelligent is your designer? - rpcman 19:17:29 9/17/99 (2)
        
        Denton and Behe - Tom 08:51:39 9/20/99 (1)
        
        more on Behe, etc. - rpcman 11:21:30 9/20/99 (0)
        
        Re: rpcman & Robert vs. Tom - Boje 17:34:44 9/17/99 (11)
        
        openness - Tom 09:03:53 9/20/99 (0)
        
        I reject origin theories which are not based on science, such as creationism(nt) - Robert 08:40:20 9/20/99 (0)
        
        trout fishing in america - the admiral 19:22:41 9/17/99 (3)
        
        Ad hominem "attacks" - Boje 02:42:00 9/19/99 (2)
        
        The real issue - Robert 08:48:51 9/20/99 (1)
        
        More accurate (in my view) focus of the discussion: - Boje 15:52:40 9/21/99 (0)
        
        mixed signals - rpcman 18:49:09 9/17/99 (4)
        
        Macroevolution - Tom 09:11:37 9/20/99 (3)
        
        the end of the macroevolution discussion - rpcman 11:24:46 9/20/99 (2)
        
        Intelligent Desing - Tom 19:02:32 9/20/99 (1)
        
        definition of macroevolution - rpcman 23:37:02 9/21/99 (0)
        
        RE: Macroevolution - Robert 09:23:10 9/17/99 (0)
      - I'd say... - Robert 08:34:01 9/17/99 (3)
        
        psychologizing - Tom 16:33:59 9/17/99 (2)
        
        Response to Toms' psychologizing - Spamboy 20:26:35 9/19/99 (1)
        
        Creation - Tom 19:27:31 9/20/99 (0)
David's Crimes - Erik 20:45:49 9/06/99 (3)
- A common misconception. . . - blue 22:32:54 9/06/99 (2)
  - Not a misconception - Erik 01:51:00 9/14/99 (1)
    - Interesting points. . . - blue 21:54:33 9/14/99 (0)
What is science - Robert 11:57:21 8/25/99 (0)
The "scientific" bible - Robert 11:51:51 8/25/99 (2)
- The Bible and science. - Gunnar 03:18:00 8/28/99 (0)
- I've gotta tell ya... - Boje 19:38:51 8/25/99 (0)
Boorstin - Drake 10:03:20 8/24/99 (4)
- The Founding Fathers were not Christians - Drake 10:11:01 8/26/99 (0)
- The Faith of our Founding Fathers - Drake 10:09:39 8/26/99 (0)
- Great post indeed! (n/t) - Gunnar 03:24:04 8/25/99 (0)
- What a great post! - Boje 11:26:42 8/24/99 (0)
Einstein v. Darwin: Einstein 1, Darwin 0 - blue 20:48:23 8/23/99 (14)
- the bloody glove - Judge Lance Ito 13:15:36 8/24/99 (1)
  - Great post! Humorous and makes valid points at the same time(nt) - Robert 11:25:35 8/25/99 (0)
- creation vs. evolution - Robert 10:33:31 8/24/99 (1)
  - Reply - blue 23:32:33 8/24/99 (0)
- Will you read a book on the subject? - rpcman 21:56:24 8/23/99 (9)
  - Anyone: How about a chart on speciation. . . - blue 00:25:22 8/24/99 (2)
    - tree of life - rpcman 10:46:15 8/24/99 (1)
      - Excellent sites - Robert 11:56:15 8/24/99 (0)
  - Yes, and about that link. . . - blue 00:22:03 8/24/99 (5)
    - ring species - rpcman 14:05:27 8/24/99 (4)
      - Quick follow-up question. . . - blue 23:04:23 8/24/99 (3)
        
        follow-up answer - jiggy 03:17:05 8/27/99 (1)
        
        definition of species - rpcman 11:02:12 8/27/99 (0)
        
        I don't know - rpcman 10:27:17 8/25/99 (0)
Something else to consider. - John 10:13:51 8/18/99 (34)
- Imagination based on the facts and evidence - rpcman 15:04:54 8/18/99 (0)
- answer - Robert 11:45:28 8/18/99 (5)
  - Hmmm - Rusty Lee 18:47:03 8/18/99 (4)
    - here we go again - rpcman 19:24:45 8/18/99 (3)
      - ...and again - Rusty Lee 13:28:05 8/19/99 (2)
        
        read first--then make your assumptions - rpcman 16:33:49 8/19/99 (1)
        
        Thanks... - Rusty Lee 17:21:59 8/19/99 (0)
- logic - the admiral 10:31:09 8/18/99 (26)
  - Consider - Rusty Lee 19:06:42 8/18/99 (25)
    - Jesus - Robert 11:25:08 8/20/99 (2)
      - Jesus - Kelly 01:17:14 8/22/99 (1)
        
        Jesus - JAK 20:38:36 8/23/99 (0)
    - jesus of nasareth - the admiral 19:41:11 8/18/99 (21)
      - But - Rusty Lee 20:15:06 8/18/99 (20)
        
        Poor comparison - Robert 11:29:09 8/20/99 (1)
        
        Jesus - JAK 20:32:26 8/23/99 (0)
        
        jesus of nasareth - the admiral 20:46:54 8/18/99 (17)
        
        Doesn't Matter, who is George Washington... - Rusty Lee 19:55:29 8/19/99 (12)
        
        Confusion? - Robert 11:31:33 8/20/99 (0)
        
        g. washington - the admiral 21:48:41 8/19/99 (9)
        
        one more - rpcman 10:33:51 8/20/99 (8)
        
        RE: G W - Rusty Lee 17:16:29 8/20/99 (7)
        
        jesus of nasareth - the admiral 10:31:00 8/21/99 (0)
        
        Jesus vs. George Washington - rpcman 19:12:27 8/20/99 (5)
        
        Don't forget John (the Gospel of, that is) - John 22:25:44 8/22/99 (4)
        
        Jesus vs. GW - JAK 20:47:17 8/23/99 (0)
        
        prove it - rpcman 00:42:49 8/23/99 (2)
        
        Geo. Washington not hard to prove - rpcman 21:38:18 8/19/99 (0)
        
        Historical Jesus - SAK 23:37:39 8/18/99 (3)
        
        Historical Jesus - Gunnar 04:01:13 8/19/99 (2)
        
        jesus of nasareth - the admiral 11:52:35 8/19/99 (1)
        
        Josephus & Jesus - Gunnar 02:30:22 8/20/99 (0)
A flat earth? - John 18:22:34 8/17/99 (9)
- Flat Earth - Robert 11:53:15 8/18/99 (0)
- earth - the admiral 08:48:08 8/18/99 (0)
- many factors - rpcman 18:58:02 8/17/99 (6)
  - Flat Earthers - Gunnar 04:18:19 8/19/99 (4)
    - flat earth - the admiral 21:52:06 8/19/99 (1)
      - Re: Flat earthers - Gunnar 01:37:30 8/20/99 (0)
    - ...and... - rpcman 16:38:44 8/19/99 (1)
      - Exactly! (n/t) - Gunnar 01:39:32 8/20/99 (0)
  - Great and interesting link(nt) - Robert 11:54:36 8/18/99 (0)
Creation-Evolution - JAK 22:12:47 8/12/99 (29)
- Not so - BJJ 16:03:12 8/13/99 (26)
  - Creation-Evolution - JAK 21:21:55 8/15/99 (25)
    - Creation-Evolution - Alan 23:00:03 8/17/99 (23)
      - Problem with there being a God - JAK 23:18:24 8/18/99 (5)
        
        Then you would probably argue that macro-evolution is not scientific, since it can't be repeated. n/t - blue 22:49:22 8/21/99 (4)
        
        Repeatable not essential but good - JAK 20:19:46 8/23/99 (0)
        
        still don't understand science - rpcman 01:38:58 8/22/99 (2)
        
        Repeatable is good -- not essential - JAK 20:16:38 8/23/99 (0)
        
        My point exactly. "Invent[ed] theory after the fact" is what origin talk is all about. n/t - blue 02:36:05 8/22/99 (0)
      - unintended humour - the admiral 08:53:51 8/18/99 (0)
      - Eyes and other evidences of evolution. - rpcman 00:31:59 8/18/99 (15)
        
        Always remember you have never SEEN macro-evolution. It, too, is based upon faith. n/t - blue 22:47:20 8/21/99 (14)
        
        Remember, you have never seen the resurrection of Jesus. It is based solely on faith(nt) - Robert 13:46:41 8/23/99 (1)
        
        True. Just like macro-evolution. n/t - blue 19:52:13 8/23/99 (0)
        
        the person with the poor memory is back! ;) - rpcman 01:36:35 8/22/99 (11)
        
        I wonder if I sent you links to scripture as proof of any point I was trying to make, would you even consider them? I think not.(n/t) - John 22:31:07 8/22/99 (1)
        
        Step 1: choosing a methodology - rpcman 12:00:17 8/23/99 (0)
        
        Is that an ad hominem? I forget . . . Plus the similarities between you and creation scientists. . . - blue 02:49:57 8/22/99 (8)
        
        Learn what the term "theory" actually entails - Robert 13:44:20 8/23/99 (7)
        
        waste of breath - Hellen 14:38:19 8/23/99 (6)
        
        In Defense of Blue - Gunnar 04:13:12 8/25/99 (0)
        
        Thanks for the info. I was unaware of blue's track record(nt) - Robert 16:33:18 8/23/99 (4)
        
        Disregard the above BS by HELLen, please. - John 18:26:06 8/23/99 (3)
        
        Something smells. Oh, it is The John. - Hellen 19:29:51 8/23/99 (2)
        
        Thanks - Robert 10:41:34 8/24/99 (1)
        
        More in defense of Blue - Boje 15:48:50 8/25/99 (0)
- theory - the admiral 09:29:37 8/13/99 (1)
  - Ditto - Drake 09:57:18 8/13/99 (0)
Evolution(s) - Mike Patrick 18:12:21 8/12/99 (5)
- Mike's post is a good example of the misunderstandings that result when evolution is not properly taught in schools(nt) - Drake 09:58:44 8/13/99 (0)
- Link - Carlos 21:00:48 8/12/99 (1)
  - most credible - rpcman 15:02:09 8/13/99 (0)
- yeah - rpcman 19:07:33 8/12/99 (0)
- openended - the admiral 18:41:51 8/12/99 (0)
Catholic curious about Mormon beliefs concerning garments - Kelly
- correct me if I'm wrong... changeling 12:47:21 7/29/99 (7)
  - Childbirth garments? Froggie 11:53:49 7/30/99 (0)
  - correction from the Church Handbook of Instructions rpcman 12:57:20 7/29/99 (3)
    - inuendo? changeling 14:58:59 7/29/99 (2)
- Garment nonsense Gunnar 01:26:40 7/29/99 (0)
rpcman info, please - Pilgrim 18:48:29 7/27/99 (1)
- answers - rpcman 20:23:20 7/27/99 (0)
The Trial of the Stick of Joseph - Gunnar 05:23:46 7/26/99
- scientific vs. apologetic methodology - rpcman 11:15:09 7/26/99 (2)
  - Thanks for the link - Gunnar 03:04:10 7/27/99 (1)
    - exactly - rpcman 11:46:14 7/27/99 (0)
Help! Who becomes a Mormon? - Amanda Cleaver 14:15:14 7/23/99 (15)
- The appeal of mormonism - Froggie 02:33:09 7/27/99 (2)
  - more on packaging - rpcman 11:07:54 7/28/99 (0)
  - Excellent post! I've never heard it stated better! (n/t) - Gunnar 02:14:24 7/28/99 (0)
- Mormon for 31 yrs...have left....ask what you like - Susan Daley 22:00:23 7/24/99 (3)
  - eternal marriage - andrea 00:07:16 7/26/99 (2)
    - Eternal Marriage - Froggie 02:48:03 7/27/99 (1)
      - I agree - Gunnar 21:32:45 8/01/99 (0)
- Only in Japan? - Cezoram 20:54:27 7/23/99 (1)
  - Japan - Templar (De Molay) 05:04:38 7/26/99 (0)
- conversion - rpcman 15:26:25 7/23/99 (2)
  - link to commitment pattern - rpcman 15:45:01 7/23/99 (0)
millennium books - D. S. Laub 16:56:42 7/22/99 (1)
- Some possibilities - rpcman 19:09:26 7/22/99 (0)
Post A Message:

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:

Back to the newest messages - More archived messages
<a href="http://leader.linkexchange.com/19/X1114340/clickle"><img width=468 height=60 border=0 ismap src="http://leader.linkexchange.com/19/X1114340/showle?"></a>

Search the Web.
Type it and go!

lds-mormon.com

Honest Intellectual Inquiry Bulletin Board Archive

Post A Message: